Return to BSD News archive
#! rnews 1152 bsd Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.ti.com!usenet From: Doug Glazar <dougg@ti.com> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: 2.1R and Win95 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 12:00:31 -0600 Organization: Texas Instruments Lines: 16 Message-ID: <3151993F.61E5@ti.com> References: <DoMF2B.Kr4.B.ecsvax@ecsvax.uncecs.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 156.117.200.215 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB2 (Win95; I) To: Wei Jen Yeh <yeh@ecsvax.uncecs.edu> Wei Jen Yeh wrote: > > Hello, > I'm to help a friend install 2.1R on his system. He's currently > running Win95 (with some type of boot selector that lets him boot > into dos/win95. I wonder if anybody knows whether it will co-exist > with the default bs/osbs135/osbsbeta or if there is any special measure > I should take before the installation. Thanks. > > --W. J. Yeh It will and does work - it's the boot configuration I'm running right now. Doug Glazar dougg@ti.com