Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!newshost.telstra.net!asstdc.scgt.oz.au!metro!metro!news.cs.su.oz.au!inferno.mpx.com.au!news.mel.aone.net.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!news.mira.net.au!news.vbc.net!samba.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!bug.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!van-bc!unixg.ubc.ca!napier From: napier@theory.chem.ubc.ca (Duncan Napier) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Why to not buy Matrox Millennium Date: 29 Mar 1996 01:48:05 GMT Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada Lines: 22 Message-ID: <4jffgl$nv5@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca> References: <4j21ph$crr@slappy.cs.utexas.edu> <4j36ev$prl@news.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE> NNTP-Posting-Host: cypress.chem.ubc.ca Keywords: Matrox Millennium Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.development.apps:13846 comp.os.linux.development.system:20278 comp.os.linux.x:28001 comp.os.linux.hardware:34817 comp.os.linux.setup:47954 comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc:364 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:2868 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:2646 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:16267 In article <4j36ev$prl@news.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE> Thomas.Weihrich@Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE (Thomas Weihrich) writes: >pmcdermo@cs.utexas.edu (Peter F. McDermott) writes: > >>Some companies just don't get it. Valdimir Vukicevic on the XFree86-3D list >>requested information on Matrox's card (first message) and received the >>second message as a reply. Unless Matrox changes their mind on release of >>information, I suggest no one interested in running a free Unix system >>buy their products. > >I perfectly understand Matrox's decision not to give away details on >their cards and programming interface. Yes, but can you explain why they have to be such as*holes about it? (Assuming this was a legitimate reply). Somebody has enquired about the possiblity making their product compatible with another platform; ALL these end users will be Matrox customers. I think that in the long run, the real losers will be Matrox customers. I suppose that it is Matrox's perogative as to how people who buy their product should use it. There may be a lesson in this: the same lesson that Apple and NEXT learned the hard way. Duncan Napier, University of British Columbia.