Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!vic.news.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!imci3!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!agate!nickkral From: nickkral@america.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Nick Kralevich) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux Date: 3 Apr 1996 09:03:36 GMT Organization: Electrical Engineering Computer Science Department, University of California at Berkeley Lines: 19 Message-ID: <4jtet8$on2@agate.berkeley.edu> References: <4issad$h1o@nadine.teleport.com> <Pine.LNX.3.91.960401105810.31921A-100000@gallup.cia-g.com> <4jqpn8$euv@agate.berkeley.edu> <4jsua0$6oc@dyson.iquest.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: america.cs.berkeley.edu In article <4jsua0$6oc@dyson.iquest.net>, John S. Dyson <root@dyson.iquest.net> wrote: >Not really, but we are careful :-). Please refer to the pain of the Linux >users in the Linux mailing lists during the transition. I don't see how there was a lot of pain. The people who suffered the most where the ones who decided to upgrade early. Personally, I just waited til a Linux ELF distribution was released, then upgraded. No pain at all. >FreeBSD will manage >the transition better for it's user base (when it needs to transition.) Ummm, ya, sure, whatever. (why do I find this phrase highly suspect?) Take care, -- Nick Kralevich nickkral@cory.eecs.berkeley.edu