Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!hobyah.cc.uq.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.eng.convex.com!newshost.convex.com!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!tporczyk From: tporczyk@netcom.com (Tony Porczyk) Subject: Re: Is replacing /bin/sh with bash recommended? Message-ID: <tporczykDp1LGy.8wK@netcom.com> Organization: ITRC References: <4j4fmh$5e8@uriah.heep.sax.de> <4j8ops$pfo@calypso.bns.com.au> <4jeim7$cde@park.uvsc.edu> <4jgj3f$lal@coyote.Artisoft.COM> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 18:46:10 GMT Lines: 15 Sender: tporczyk@netcom2.netcom.com mday@elbereth.org (Matt Day) writes: > I think that most people will agree that it is easier to tell if the > output of ls contained any green text than if the output contained any > files with a "*" following them (ala ls -F). For people who prefer to write on greyscale monitors, colorized ls is an absolute pain the ass. t. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tony Porczyk * tporczyk@netcom.com * San Jose, California GIT/ED d++$(!d) s++:++ a? C++++ UBSL++++$ P+ E--- W(--) N++ !k w-- M- V? b- PS+++@ PE++ O X-- Y++@ PGP-- t+@ 5-- R* D---- !e>e++@ h* y** r+++(*)+++(*)> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------