*BSD News Article 64889


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!qns3.qns.com!imci4!imci3!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!mail2news.alias.net!myriad!mylinuxbox!suck!netcom.com!stephenk
From: stephenk@netcom.com (Stephen Knilans)
Subject: Re: Why to not buy Matrox Millennium
Message-ID: <stephenkDpCsvp.LBu@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
References: <4joi3n$bvb@news.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE> <stephenkDp7nHo.369@netcom.com> <4jv7c9$m5t@park.uvsc.edu>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 19:59:49 GMT
Lines: 31
Sender: stephenk@netcom9.netcom.com
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.development.apps:14009 comp.os.linux.development.system:20502 comp.os.linux.x:28312 comp.os.linux.hardware:35172 comp.os.linux.setup:48594 comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc:408 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:2938 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:2706 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:16482

In article <4jv7c9$m5t@park.uvsc.edu> Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> writes:
>Not that this little side-discussion has anything to do with the
>subject line...
>
>
>stephenk@netcom.com (Stephen Knilans) wrote:
>] In article <4joi3n$bvb@news.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE> Thomas.Weihrich@Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE (Thomas Weihrich) writes:
>] >You still don't get it ...
>] >
>] >Linux is by no means a commercially usable product. It has too many
>] >flaws to be of good use for businesses let alone ISPs. 
>] 
>] Name ****ONE****!  So far, I haven't heard ONE legitimate reason!  BTW I have heard
>] of at least THREE ISPs that use LINUX, and some BIG companies have decided to
>] support LINUX!  LINUX supports more, is more flexible, and faster in areas, etc...
>] than SCO!!!!!!!!!  I use SCO at work, and Linux at home!
>
>Running binaries under IBCS2 emulation instead of running them
>native means no support from the software vendors when the
>programs fail to run under Linux.

MOST are NATIVE aps!


>That's why Matorx doesn't think Linux (or BSD) is enough of a
>market to care to change their policy (a policy which does not,
>as they purported in David's quotation of them, protect their IP).

This is NOT about Linux!  

>