Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!newshost.telstra.net!asstdc.scgt.oz.au!metro!metro!news.cs.su.oz.au!inferno.mpx.com.au!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.uwa.edu.au!disco.iinet.net.au!news.uoregon.edu!news.dacom.co.kr!usenet.seri.re.kr!news.cais.net!news.ac.net!news1.erols.com!newsmaster@erols.com From: rgerharz@erols.com (Reinhold J. Gerharz) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Linux or FreeBSD, which is more reliable? Date: Wed, 03 Apr 1996 05:45:19 GMT Organization: Erols Internet Services Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4jt34a$1nm@news7.erols.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: as29s17.erols.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:16522 comp.os.linux.advocacy:43250 comp.os.linux.misc:95783 I have dabbled with Linux for a few years, now, but have never tried FreeBSD. I would like to use one or the other to build a data acquisition system that must stay up for more than a year at a time. With that in mind, could anyone how knows both systems comment on the desirability of one over the other? Thanks, RG