Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.bhp.com.au!mel.dit.csiro.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!qns3.qns.com!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news1.erols.com!newsmaster@erols.com From: rgerharz@erols.com (Reinhold J. Gerharz) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Linux or FreeBSD, which is more reliable? Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 03:16:24 GMT Organization: Erols Internet Services Lines: 14 Message-ID: <4ju4s6$jc7@news6.erols.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: as31s09.erols.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:16534 comp.os.linux.advocacy:43260 comp.os.linux.misc:95803 I have dabbled with Linux for a few years, now, but have never tried FreeBSD. I would like to use one or the other to build a data acquisition system that must stay up for more than a year at a time. With that in mind, could anyone how knows both systems comment on the desirability of one over the other? Thanks, RG Pardon me if this gets multiple posts. My news provider is very unreliable!