Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.at!hp4at!mcsun!ub4b!sunbim!usenet From: db@sunbim.be (Danny Backx) Subject: Re: x11perf on XFree86,386bsd:data Message-ID: <1992Oct14.160604.22245@sunbim.be> Keywords: benchmark x11perf Sender: usenet@sunbim.be (user news) Reply-To: db@sunbim.be Organization: BIM n.v. Everberg Belgium References: <1992Oct14.093034.25042@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 16:06:04 GMT Lines: 40 >Please send me results for other X terminals using >the same parameter i.e. bigtilerect500. > Let us see how slow 386 systems really are. Sure :-) I just did what you asked off of a (very loaded) SPARCstation IPC, with a NCD19r as the X server. If you're a 386 fan, please sit down before you read. whitney!db 222 % x11perf -bigtilerect500 x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.3 DECWINDOWS (Compatibility String) Network Computing Devices Inc. server on db-ncd:0.0 from whitney Wed Oct 14 17:00:06 1992 Sync time adjustment is 11.6733 msecs. 300 reps @ 23.0611 msec ( 43.4/sec): 500x500 161x145 tiled rectangle 300 reps @ 23.3278 msec ( 42.9/sec): 500x500 161x145 tiled rectangle 300 reps @ 23.0611 msec ( 43.4/sec): 500x500 161x145 tiled rectangle 300 reps @ 23.1278 msec ( 43.2/sec): 500x500 161x145 tiled rectangle 300 reps @ 23.0944 msec ( 43.3/sec): 500x500 161x145 tiled rectangle 1500 trep @ 23.1344 msec ( 43.2/sec): 500x500 161x145 tiled rectangle Looking at the values between brackets, the 386es are only about a factor of 20 slower. --- Danny Backx System Engineer E-Mail: db@sunbim.be (or uunet!mcsun!ub4b!sunbim!db) Telephone: +32(2)759.59.25 Fax : +32(2)759.47.95 Postal Mail : Danny Backx BIM Kwikstraat 4 3078 Everberg Belgium