Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:33544 comp.unix.bsd:6617
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!cs.weber.edu!terry
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C)
Subject: Re: Question on Diamond Clock Synthesizer
Message-ID: <1992Oct15.032556.16357@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
Sender: news@fcom.cc.utah.edu
Organization: University of Utah Computer Center
References: <1992Oct13.175214.19534@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1bfp2oINNn4a@maverick.ksu.ksu.edu> <1992Oct14.033731.28397@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1bhl84INNff@network.ucsd.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 03:25:56 GMT
Lines: 27
In article <1bhl84INNff@network.ucsd.edu>, brian@ucsd.edu (Brian Kantor) writes:
|> "Accessory after the fact" is in relation to criminal procedings.
|>
|> Trade secrets are a civil matter. Not the same thing at all.
|>
|> Please consult a lawyer.
|> - Brian
Brian is of course correct. The civil law phrase for the equivalent of
accepting partial liability for something has escaped me, and I picked that
as a poor substitute, although I still believe it to be a better wording
than "the equivalent of accepting partial liability for something". At
least in isn't verbose, and it indicates an analogous condition.
Terry Lambert
terry@icarus.weber.edu
terry_lambert@novell.com
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I have an 8 user poetic license" - me
Get the 386bsd FAQ from agate.berkeley.edu:/pub/386BSD/386bsd-0.1/unofficial
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------