Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.artisoft.com!usenet From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Why to not buy Matrox Millennium Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 15:33:04 -0700 Organization: Me Lines: 68 Message-ID: <31702BA0.58F7B46@lambert.org> References: <4jv7of$m5t@park.uvsc.edu> <stephenkDpCt4A.LxJ@netcom.com> <4kfk15$dgs@coyote.Artisoft.COM> <stephenkDpnHM8.864@netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: hecate.artisoft.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (X11; I; Linux 1.1.76 i486) Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.development.apps:14405 comp.os.linux.development.system:21210 comp.os.linux.x:29220 comp.os.linux.hardware:36196 comp.os.linux.setup:50262 comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc:547 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:3136 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:2934 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:17182 Stephen Knilans wrote: ] >] >You are a developer. You represent zero market segment (I can say ] >] >this; I am also a developer). ] >] ] >] If they TRULY believe this, then I ***DARE*** them to remove ] >] Windows drivers, and tell bill gates they won't support his ] >] companies products! He IS just a developer! ] > ] >He is not a developer, he is a monopolist. He wields monopolistic ] >power in the market place -- or rather, his company does... he ] >represents (possibly) millions of developers, actually. ] ] He is STILL a developer! He is not JUST a developer. If you want to argue "fish" vs. "trout", then fine. Bill Gates is a *successful* developer, whereas you (and I) not having at least $4Billion to our names, are *not* successful. Only a *successful* developer can tell a market "jump!" and get "how high?" for a response (as opposed to "aw, screw you"). ] >] >Now if you were a VP at Ingram or Egghead, they would care. ] >] ] >] WHY? Egghead and Ingram do NOTHING to generate sales! They are ] >] market driuen. Their WHOLE job is buying what they THINK the ] >] customer will, and then selling at a markup! The customer buys ] >] what they think will best run that "zero market" developers ] >] software! ] > ] >I think that most developers are running MS OS's.. but even so, ] >by your logic, all they have to do is convince Egghead and ] >Ingram that customers will buy their cards, and Egghead and ] >Ingram will buy their cards. They could care less if end ] >users buy their cards. ] ] RIGHT! ] ] ] >And you as a developer have to support what the customers *do* ] >buy, not what they *should* buy if they were in possesion of ] >all the facts. ] ] RIGHT! ] ] It IS hard to support cards that are made by someone like ] Matrox though! No it's not. Sign the non-disclosure and limit yourself to distributing binaries. That may be *politically* hard for you, but it sure as hell isn't *technically* hard. Developers solve *technical* problems. If you want a *political* problem solved, consult a politician (or better, a statesman). One way of solving a *political* problem is to have *political* clout, like Bill Gates (which he derives from being a monopolist, not from being a developer). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.