*BSD News Article 65897


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.corpcomm.net!newstand.syr.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!ub!ns1.potsdam.edu!news
From: nelson@ns.crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Historic Opportunity facing Free Unix (was Re: The Lai/Baker paper, benchmarks, and the world of free UNIX)
Date: 15 Apr 1996 04:04:49 GMT
Organization: Crynwr Software
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <NELSON.96Apr15000449@ns.crynwr.com>
References: <4ki055$60l@Radon.Stanford.EDU> <jdd.829261293@cdf.toronto.edu>
	<NELSON.96Apr12112334@ns.crynwr.com>
	<4krrmj$dsu@library.erc.clarkson.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ns.crynwr.com
In-reply-to: shapircs@craft.camp.clarkson.edu's message of 14 Apr 1996 21:45:55 GMT
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.development.system:21320 comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc:577 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:3177 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:2988 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:17277 comp.os.linux.advocacy:45344

In article <4krrmj$dsu@library.erc.clarkson.edu> shapircs@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Carl S. Shapiro) writes:

> Russell Nelson (nelson@ns.crynwr.com) wrote:
> 
> (stuff cut out)
> 
> : That's because they weren't working cooperatively.  What, pray tell,
> : Jordan, prevents you from improving the flaws that you see in Linux,
> : to the point where it is as good as FreeBSD or NetBSD or OpenBSD or
> : 386BSD?

Hey Carl, how do?  You're exactly one of the FreeBSD contributors I'm
thinking of.  You have a laundry list of Linux shortcomings.  Linux
has the market share and mind share that NONE of the *BSD* operating
systems have.  That's why Linux is the only free operating system with
any chance of overcoming any Microsoft operating system.  So fix the
laundry list.

> GPL?  Why should I have to give all of my work away for free?

If you contribute to *BSD, you do exactly that.  It's essentially
impossible (unmanagably large problem) to have an operating system
with a large number of significant copyright holders, distribute the
code in any proprietary manner, and compensate the copyright holders.
The Linux kernel uses the GPL, and the *BSD kernels use the BSD
license, to bypass that problem.  What is the actual (not perceived)
difference?

Yes, you can use the BSD-licensed code to build a proprietary,
distributable solution, but then you're not contributing to free
software.

-- 
-russ <nelson@crynwr.com>    http://www.crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr Software   | Crynwr Software sells packet driver support | PGP ok
11 Grant St.      | +1 315 268 1925 voice | If you would seek peace, 
Potsdam, NY 13676 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | first seek freedom