*BSD News Article 66438


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!inferno.mpx.com.au!news.mel.aone.net.au!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!oleane!plug.news.pipex.net!pipex!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!EU.net!Germany.EU.net!Dortmund.Germany.EU.net!interface-business.de!usenet
From: j@ida.interface-business.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc
Subject: Re: UNIX or LINUX?  Suggestions Please!
Date: 22 Apr 1996 09:55:44 GMT
Organization: interface business GmbH Dresden
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <4lfl30$ote@innocence.interface-business.de>
References: <31786EFB.FAF@io.org> <Dq7nJx.KvI@uns.bris.ac.uk>
  <317AE7D3.38FE@io.org>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@interface-business.de (Joerg Wunsch)
NNTP-Posting-Host: ida.interface-business.de
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.6

Jeff Lloyd <jlloyd@io.org> writes:

>> Both BSD and Linux are UNIX, FreeBSD is the one you should consider, and

(Btw: They are Unix or unix or UN*X.  But they are not UNIX, since
this is a trademark in the US and a few other countries.  Ask whoever
owns the label today...)

>Is X-windows available for FreeBSD?  I assume it is....  But I guess I mean

It is, and XFree86 is just the same as for Linux.  There's also a good
quality commercial Xserver available from Xinside.

>is Motif available or just the Xfree stuff?  I am used to Solaris at school,

There's a Motif, but it's payware, and the distribution i've seen (by
Lasermoon, UK) is best described with a single word: terrible.  Let's
hope that Xinside (the vendor of Accelerated X) will come up with its
Motif RSN.

>and would preferably like something compatible.  Maybe I should ask around
>in a Solaris newsgroup?  I may be working on something different this 
>summer though, so I will have to wait and see..

Slowaris (i.e., Slowaris 2.X) is SysV-based.  Linux is not SysV-based,
but resembles it somewhat more than BSD.  The differences are mostly
in the system maintenance area however, the userland is more similar
these days.

>> If you're going to use BSD don't use the 'current' source.
                                               / \          
>What is this?................................. |

The development sources of each of the BSD distributions.  Roughly
comparable with Linux 1.3.something (or what their development level
is actually called now -- i dunno), with the exception that all BSD's
handle the complete system, not only the kernel.

The latest release versions are: NetBSD 1.1, FreeBSD 2.1.  (OpenBSD?
I don't know.)

-- 
J"org Wunsch					       Unix support engineer
joerg_wunsch@interface-business.de       http://www.interface-business.de/~j