Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!inquo!in-news.erinet.com!imci5!pull-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!agate!reason.cdrom.com!usenet From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: When is 2.2R due out? Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 21:40:17 -0700 Organization: Walnut Creek CDROM Lines: 22 Message-ID: <31844830.167EB0E7@FreeBSD.org> References: <4lgt27$rme@church.dcss.mcmaster.ca> <4ljdbg$ng0@uriah.heep.sax.de> <DqI2w3.DyI@news2.new-york.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: time.cdrom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b2 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386) To: Louis Epstein <le@put.com> Louis Epstein wrote: > I gather that 2.1.1R is supposed to precede 2.2R...and both will be > official Walnut Creek CD-ROMs? You gather entirely correctly on both counts. > I've noticed that there is a 2.2-SNAP but NOT a 2.1.1-SNAP presently > available. Mostly due to time pressures only; I've been focusing my time more on doing the 2.2 SNAPs and a lack of machine resources forces me to do pretty much one branch at a time - I have only one build machine, and transitioning it between -stable and -current is quite a chore. That said, if 2.1.1 is looking like it's going to slip then I'll see what I can do about laying my hands on a machine that can run -stable long enough to snapshot it. I've certainly no problem in theory with doing SNAPs along both branches. -- - Jordan Hubbard President, FreeBSD Project