*BSD News Article 67445


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!asstdc.scgt.oz.au!nsw.news.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!vic.news.telstra.net!news.mira.net.au!news.vbc.net!news.cais.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!news.texas.net!news1.best.com!nntp1.best.com!flash.noc.best.net!not-for-mail
From: dillon@best.com (Matthew Dillon)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: FreeBSD as a router
Date: 2 May 1996 00:05:23 -0700
Organization: Best Internet Communications, Inc. (info@best.com)
Lines: 41
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4m9mrj$3ck@flash.noc.best.net>
References: <4lfm8j$kn3@nuscc.nus.sg> <4m39q0$bqu@shellx.best.com> <4m8a1t$7rr@samba.rahul.net> <4m8uum$hcm@shellx.best.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: flash.noc.best.net

:In article <4m8uum$hcm@shellx.best.com>,
:Russell Carter <rcarter@shellx.best.com> wrote:
:>In article <4m8a1t$7rr@samba.rahul.net>, Rahul Dhesi  <dhesi@rahul.net> wrote:
:>>In <4m39q0$bqu@shellx.best.com> rcarter@shellx.best.com (Russell Carter) writes:
:>>
:>>>TCP STREAM TEST to gelifast
:>>...
:>>>Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput  
:>>>bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec  
:>>
:>>> 32768  32768   8192    60.01      40.99   
:>>
:>>What happens to the throughput when you have a big routing table with,
:>>say, 30,000 entries, and verious-sized prefixes using BGP4?  In that
:>>case each packet to be routed requires a search for the right routing
:>>table entry.  How much route caching does FreeBSD do?  How efficiently
:>>does it search for the longest matching BGP prefix when selecting a
:>>route?
:>
:>Interesting questions.  I'd like to know the answer too, but it doesn't
:>look like I will have the opportunity anytime soon.  Feel free to try
:>it out!
:>
:>Russell
:>
:>>-- 
:>>Rahul Dhesi <dhesi@rahul.net>
:>>"please ignore Dhesi" -- Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>

    Dunno re: 100 Mbps links, but we used to run a full internet
    routing table with gated / BGP4 on a 486.  It's a radix table so
    it didn't have any problems with respect to packet rate.

    Unfortunately, gated at the time (8 months ago), combined with
    possible bugs in the OS, was *NOT* a stable configuration.  The
    machine would constantly panic, die, loose track of routes, etc...

    I would not suggest it.

						-Matt