Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!solace!nntp.uio.no!news.cais.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!stargate.ingress.com!news.new-york.net!ritz.mordor.com!ritz From: ritz@ritz.mordor.com (Chris Mauritz) Subject: Re: pipeline burst cache X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] Lines: 15 Organization: Mordor International Message-ID: <DqsIxu.AAp@ritz.mordor.com> References: <4man1d$h8h@moon.igcom.net> Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 18:20:18 GMT David B. Bauman (david@terra.igcom.net) wrote: : I was wondering if anyone has a bsd/os server using a pipeline burst cache : trident chipset motherboard? : I have been checking out a Pentium/133 motherboard/cpu, and was wondering if : bsd/os has any problems working with it. If the cache design on the motherboard is properly implemented, BSD/OS will never "see" the cache and things should hum right along. The various reviews in computer rags that I've seen claim that EDO RAM + pipeline burst cache can improve performance by 5-10%. Using EDO alone resulted in no speed difference. Cheers, Chris -- Christopher Mauritz | For info on internet access: ritz@mordor.com | finger/mail info@ritz.mordor.com OR Mordor International | http://www.mordor.com/ 201/212/718 internet access | Modem: (201)433-7343,(212)843-3451