Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!inferno.mpx.com.au!news.mel.aone.net.au!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.bb.net!news.blarg.net!news From: future@blarg.net (Tim Gerchmez) Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.mac,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.acorn.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.next.advocacy,comp.sys.powerpc.advocacy,comp.unix.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.machten,comp.unix.pc-clone.16bit,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.user-friendly Subject: Re: IBM's are good for games, and well sorry to say, THATS IT! Date: Mon, 06 May 1996 00:18:19 GMT Organization: Blarg! Online Services - 206/441-9109 Lines: 18 Message-ID: <318d4532.2492565@news.blarg.net> References: <---0405961742330001@dyna-37.net7b.io.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup28.blarg.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/16.182 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au alt.binaries.warez.mac:3978 alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc:37745 comp.os.linux.advocacy:48130 comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy:126971 comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy:23853 comp.os.msdos.misc:54789 comp.os.os2.advocacy:199477 comp.sys.acorn.advocacy:8874 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:104220 comp.sys.next.advocacy:35115 comp.sys.powerpc.advocacy:3243 comp.unix.advocacy:20168 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:18799 comp.unix.bsd.misc:914 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:3509 comp.unix.machten:2416 comp.unix.pc-clo ne.16bit:757 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:9313 comp.unix.shell:32420 comp.unix.solaris:67925 comp.unix.user-friendly:3707 On Sat, 04 May 1996 17:42:33 -0400, --@--.0101 (Dave) wrote: > I use both platforms of systems regularly, (IBM and Mac) and I must say >that IBMs are ONLY good for games! And thats it, they are worthless >otherwise... In fact, if there were more games available for Mac, IBM >would be 100% worthless. > > I don't understand what's so good about IBM's anyway!? Whats so >appealing about a dumbass OS? > > Well thats my two cents. but worth maybe a penny at best... -- Email me at future@blarg.net (flames directed to /dev/null). Visit my universe at http://www.blarg.net/~future/index.html