Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.ysu.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!news.cse.psu.edu!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.vader.org!news.demon.co.uk!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!cuillin.org.uk!usenet From: Guy Dawson <guy@cuillin.org.uk> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc Subject: Re: pipeline burst cache Date: Wed, 08 May 1996 19:05:13 +0100 Organization: Cuillin Lines: 17 Message-ID: <3190E259.41C67EA6@cuillin.org.uk> References: <4man1d$h8h@moon.igcom.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: dearg.cuillin.org.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: cuillin.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b2 (X11; I; BSD/OS 2.0 i386) David B. Bauman wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone has a bsd/os server using a pipeline burst cache > trident chipset motherboard? > I have been checking out a Pentium/133 motherboard/cpu, and was wondering if > bsd/os has any problems working with it. I'm using BSD/OS 2.1 on a Trident M/B with 512KB of pipeline burst with no problem. Runs a treat. As far as I can make out, pipeline burst seems a better investment than EDO RAM and probably make EDO of little extra use. Guy -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Guy Dawson @ SMTP - guy@cuillin.org.uk // ICBM - 6.15.16W 57.12.23N 986M 4.4>5.4 4.4>5.4 4.4>5.4 The Reality Check's in the Post! 4.4>5.4 4.4>5.4