*BSD News Article 67987


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.ysu.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!news.cse.psu.edu!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.vader.org!news.demon.co.uk!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!cuillin.org.uk!usenet
From: Guy Dawson <guy@cuillin.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc
Subject: Re: pipeline burst cache
Date: Wed, 08 May 1996 19:05:13 +0100
Organization: Cuillin
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <3190E259.41C67EA6@cuillin.org.uk>
References: <4man1d$h8h@moon.igcom.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dearg.cuillin.org.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: cuillin.demon.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b2 (X11; I; BSD/OS 2.0 i386)

David B. Bauman wrote:
> 
> I was wondering if anyone has a bsd/os server using a pipeline burst cache
> trident chipset motherboard?
> I have been checking out a Pentium/133 motherboard/cpu, and was wondering if
> bsd/os has any problems working with it.

I'm using BSD/OS 2.1 on a Trident M/B with 512KB of pipeline burst with
no problem. Runs a treat.

As far as I can make out, pipeline burst seems a better investment than
EDO RAM and probably make EDO of little extra use.

Guy
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Guy Dawson @ SMTP - guy@cuillin.org.uk // ICBM - 6.15.16W 57.12.23N 986M
4.4>5.4 4.4>5.4 4.4>5.4 The Reality Check's in the Post! 4.4>5.4 4.4>5.4