Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.hawaii.edu!ames!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!usenet.etri.re.kr!news.kreonet.re.kr!usenet.seri.re.kr!news.cais.net!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!zib-berlin.de!news.tu-chemnitz.de!irz401!uriah.heep!news From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD ... Date: 10 May 1996 21:27:49 GMT Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden Lines: 23 Message-ID: <4n0ccl$ooo@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <3188C1E2.45AE@onramp.net> <4mnsc5$6qo@sundial.sundial.net> <Dr1wrL.My0@kithrup.com> <3191B103.167EB0E7@freebsd.org> <4mtsek$rbs@samba.rahul.net> Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.heep.sax.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.6 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Rahul Dhesi <dhesi@rahul.net> wrote: > Given that the hardest thing about maintaining two parallel operating > systems is the device support, > > How hard would it be for both Linux and FreeBSD teams to revise their > respective oeprating systems to accept virtually identical device > driver code? Basically impossible. The underlying concepts are simply too different. I've loosely followed a series in a German Unix magazine about Linux kernel programming, and i must say they are simply different. I think if you care to design a driver for both systems from ground up, it might be workable, but it's still hard to maintain. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)