*BSD News Article 68892


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!nwnews.wa.com!news1.halcyon.com!chinook.halcyon.com!dorian
From: dorian@chinook.halcyon.com (Aaron Mitchell)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Subject: Re: Netbsd and that other operating system
Date: 19 May 1996 01:28:28 GMT
Organization: Northwest Nexus, Inc. - Professional Internet Services
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <4nltfs$lqr@news1.halcyon.com>
References: <4mjmhd$lq3@newsource.ihug.co.nz> <4mssh4$ckr@rtnews.rto.dec.com> <4lYnOmK00iWZI1uVxo@andrew.cmu.edu> <4ne1cs$ogu@newsource.ihug.co.nz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chinook.halcyon.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

: I like you have two machines , one running netbsd/linux and another machine 
: running windows for word processing and internet. I would find it a lot less 
: hassle if I could do it all on the one machine. 

Try dual booting between 95 & your choice of Unix.

: There is one important differnce between Netbsd and Win95/NT etc. For 
: starters Netbsd can run on multiple platforms , which helps create a 
: consistent standard. But more importantly Netbsd is  FREE. For the likes of 
: you and me win95 costs less than a days wages, but in other places in the 
: world the cost of win95 is more than a week or months wages. What is a person 
: to do if they want win95, either they pirate a copy or go without. 

I doubt that someone who can afford a computer that Windows95 will run on
(realistically a 486 with at least 8 megs of ram and a SVGA card) can't
afford the $85 95 costs. If you can't afford 95, but do have the computer
to run it on, someone must have given you the computer.

: Surely I cant be hard to provide the graphical shell and applications for 
: Netbsd that make it a truely free operating system for the basic computer 
: users out there.

Isn't Xwindows there to provide this purpose? a graphical shell?  If not
NetBSD, then Linux or FreeBSD.  I don't think your arguments hold up very
well.

I think there is a place for all OSes.  Beleive me, their
word be no Microsoft Office or Photoshop if there wasn't a commercial
environment to pay for the work that was required to create them.  If
there wasn't a commercial based OS, like Windows95, less computers would
be sold, less great hardware and software packages would be developed, and
overall the world would be more computer illiterate on a whole.  If you
take out the profit in computers, it turns into a hobby.  

It's like saying we should demand that all of the NASA employees volunteer
to send people to outer space.  Commerce backs the computer industry, and
keeps it from stagnating.