Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!solace!nntp.uio.no!news.cais.net!bofh.dot!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!newsgate.duke.edu!agate!benco From: benco@ucsee.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (Ben Cottrell) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Mach Microkernel + FreeBSD + PowerMacs Date: 21 May 1996 18:20:52 GMT Organization: UC Berkeley Society of Electrical Engineers Lines: 22 Message-ID: <4nt1i4$5ah@agate.berkeley.edu> References: <960520191156-rrwood@io.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsee.eecs.berkeley.edu In article <960520191156-rrwood@io.org>, Roy Wood <rrwood@io.org> wrote: >I prefer FreeBSD to Linux, so I wonder how hard it would be to port over >FreeBSD to run on top of the microkernel, too. Thus far, I've used >FreeBSD only on x86 PC's, so I'm not even really aware of whether it >already has support for Mach or not-- anyone better informed have >anything to comment there? Actually, this is better suited to NetBSD than FreeBSD :-) As I understand the distinction, NetBSD is an extension of the original CSRG efforts--it's multiplatform and aims to provide a free UNIX to everyone--whereas FreeBSD is an optimized BSD-like OS for the PC architecture only, and works better than NetBSD on the PC architecture only. As a matter of fact, there has been a discussion of porting NetBSD to the PowerMacs--I think the consensus is that it'll be easy, that there has already been a port of NetBSD to the Mach microkernel, but that dobody so far has really volunteered to take charge of the port. -- ____ -Ben Cottrell (home page http://www.csua.berkeley.edu/~benco/) \ / GCS(M) dpu s:+ a16 C++++ UB++++ P++(--) L- @E- W++(-) N++ K+ w-- !O++ @M+ \/ PS++ ?PE Y PGP-- @t+ 5? X? R--(+) tv-- b+++ DI-- D- G+ e h!(*) r%(++) y+** Tamino on FurryMUCK and YiffNet IRC Pendor! NetBSD!