*BSD News Article 69262


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.thepoint.net!news1!not-for-mail
From: root@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson)
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: dyson.iquest.net
Message-ID: <4o1om8$156@dyson.iquest.net>
Sender: news@iquest.net (News Admin)
Organization: John S. Dyson's home machine
References: <318FA7CB.8D8@hkstar.com> <4nmpun$i6@uriah.heep.sax.de> <4nrk6d$14h@Mercury.mcs.com> <31A2A83D.67A89A35@lambert.org>
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 13:20:08 GMT
Lines: 17

In article <31A2A83D.67A89A35@lambert.org>,
Terry Lambert  <terry@lambert.org> wrote:
>Leslie Mikesell wrote:
>
>] and networking speed seems reasonable. How would freeBSD be
>] better if I don't need greater-than-ethernet speeds?
>
>Depends onthe loading characteristics for the machine, *exactly*
>what you plan to use it for, etc..
>
Following on to Terry's comment:

Since the FreeBSD networking uses less CPU, it means that more is
available for you.  Of course, if you need very little bandwidth, then
it isn't important.

John