Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!news.sdsmt.edu!nntp.uac.net!news.tufts.edu!blanket.mitre.org!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!panix!not-for-mail From: jbrock@panix.com (John Brock) Newsgroups: alt.fan.bill-gates,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,alt.org.team-os2,alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Why no M$ AppleScript or Rexx imitations? Date: 2 Jun 1996 14:28:51 -0400 Organization: Panix Lines: 27 Message-ID: <4osmh3$25t@panix3.panix.com> References: <4mlpnf$d4p@sidhe.memra.com> <petrichDs5Fv9.5Cr@netcom.com> <4ohcuv$772@ari.ari.net> <4op27j$igq@newnews.iafrica.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix3.panix.com Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au alt.fan.bill-gates:22866 comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc:108575 comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc:144687 comp.os.os2.advocacy:206808 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:110872 comp.os.linux.advocacy:50783 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:20531 In article <4op27j$igq@newnews.iafrica.com>, Chris Quirke <cquirke@iafrica.com> wrote: >kiyoinc@kiyoinc.com wrote: >>When Microsoft builds hardware what do you get? A mouse and keyboard! > >>When IBM builds hardware what do you get? Robot tape libraries that >>hold Terabytes of data, fibre optic data connections that run at >>hundreds of mega bytes per second, un-interruptable, remotely >>maintainable, parallel, redundant, mirrored, archived, restorable, >>failsafe. Hardware that runs for decades. CPU's that can be maintained >>and upgraded while the operating system is running production work. >Can almost forgive them CGA, under-clocked processors, MCA, PS/1 with >DOS 4 in ROM, recent "why buy a clone?" PC-300 systems without L2 >cache, and all those artificial incompatabilities introduced to >differentiate the market and so allow huge markups where no >competition exists... Just for the record, I bought my IBM PC 300 a year ago, and it has a 256KB L2 cache. It was an option though, and I had to pay extra for it, but if I hadn't bought it then I could have upgraded later. And, also for the record, I *like* my IBM PC 300! :-) -- John Brock jbrock@panix.com