Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.hawaii.edu!news.uoregon.edu!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!agate!reason.cdrom.com!usenet From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Q: "OPTION GATEWAY" vs. "sysctl net.inet.ip.forewarding" Date: Fri, 07 Jun 1996 19:31:55 -0700 Organization: Walnut Creek CDROM Lines: 9 Message-ID: <31B8E61B.167EB0E7@FreeBSD.org> References: <4p61ad$6li@gwdu19.gwdg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: time.cdrom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b4 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386) To: Stefan Witzel <switzel@uni-goettingen.de> Stefan Witzel wrote: > > Is there a difference between OPTION GATEWAY in the config file and the > parameter net.inet.ip.forwarding of sysctl ? Yes, `options GATEWAY' is obsolete and dead. -- - Jordan Hubbard President, FreeBSD Project