Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!nntp.sei.cmu.edu!news.psc.edu!hoopoe.psc.edu!not-for-mail From: peterb@hoopoe.psc.edu (Peter Berger) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: whats better.. freebsd or linux? Date: 17 Jun 1996 10:55:33 -0400 Organization: Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4q3rl5$ot9@hoopoe.psc.edu> References: <4h5m2o$amd@gryphon.phoenix.net> <4q0b0p$md8@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com> <31C47239.41C67EA6@star-gate.com> <4q2did$a2@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: hoopoe.psc.edu In article <4q2did$a2@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com>, <aks@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com> wrote: >Let me recall... ULTRIX, Digital Unix, Sun OS, Solaris, SCO UNIX, Interactive, >IRIX, HP-UX, AIX. Yeah, Linux is may first mulitasking OS. What about VMS and a >slew of other OS's? If you've really used Digital Unix, how come you didn't realize that it is BSD based? Is Digital Unix "dead" also? Are you?