Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!zib-berlin.de!unlisys!harvey.snafu.de!turbocat.snafu.de!root From: dave@turbocat.snafu.de (David Wetzel) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc Subject: Re: How do NetBSD and FreeBSD differ? Date: 17 Jun 1996 12:39:48 GMT Organization: Turbocat's Development, Germany Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4q3jmk$24t@turbocat.snafu.de> References: <4pvg1u$3aj@news.umbc.edu> <SOUVA.96Jun16153706@aibn58.astro.uni-bonn.de> <4q2kma$qru@voodoo.pdx.oneworld.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: turbocat.snafu.de X-Newsreader: Alexandra.app (Version 0.82) downsj@threadway.teeny.org (Jason Downs) wrote: (...) > Of course, there's also OpenBSD, which is not only multi-platform (with > different architectures and better support on others), but also supports > things like the FreeBSD package system. OpenBSD is not only superiour > technology to both of the other systems, but also easier to use by regular > people, and easier to do development with then NetBSD. Last time I checked, I noticed that OpenBSD/amiga == NetBSD. Why did they start another project? Why don't they work on ONE BSD? _ _ _(_)(_)_ David Wetzel, Turbocat's Development, (_) __ (_) Buchhorster Strasse, D-16567 Muehlenbeck/Berlin, FRG, _/ \_ Phone +49 33056 82151, Fax +49 33056 82152 (______) dave@turbocat.snafu.de (NeXTMail)