*BSD News Article 7134


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uunet!emba-news.uvm.edu!trantor.emba.uvm.edu!wollman
From: wollman@trantor.emba.uvm.edu (Garrett Wollman)
Subject: Re: GNU software for 386BSD
Message-ID: <1992Oct28.003559.3424@uvm.edu>
Sender: news@uvm.edu
Organization: University of Vermont, EMBA Computer Facility
References: <2521@bigfoot.first.gmd.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 00:35:59 GMT
Lines: 35

In article <2521@bigfoot.first.gmd.de> gt@prosun.first.gmd.de (Gerd Truschinski) writes:
>Is there anybody out there trying to build the 'binutils-2.0'?
>The same question about 'gas-1.92.3'. I try to configure it with
>something like --host=i386-386bsd-bsd, but it seems that the 
>GNU project didn't work with this kind of OS.

sh configure i386-none-bsd

This won't actually work for the current binutils, BUT...

Grab GDB 4.7.  This includes the latest version of binutils, which
includes 386bsd support.  Then move the `ld' and `binutils'
directories over into the GDB hierarchy.  Now you can configure for
i386-none-bsd.  This should allow you to make the binutils.

(Note that I didn't actually do this; I independently ported the BFD
as a part of a project that I'm working on.  I have looked at GDB 4.7,
however.)

>This is something
>I do not understand. First they are waiting for a free OS, and
>then they don't use it.

They are *writing* a Free (with a capital F) OS.  And keep in mind
that the development of the development tools (except gcc) is mostly
done by Cygnus, which seems to be making quite a lot of money off it
(good for them!), as opposed to the FSF proper.

-GAWollman

-- 
Garrett A. Wollman   | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... 
wollman@emba.uvm.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance.
uvm-gen!wollman      | It is a bond more powerful than absence.  We like people
UVM disagrees.       | who like Shashish.  - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant