*BSD News Article 71366


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.mira.net.au!inquo!news.seinf.abb.se!nooft.abb.no!Norway.EU.net!nntp.uio.no!news.cais.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.thepoint.net!news1!not-for-mail
From: root@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson)
Subject: Re: Whats so great about FreeBSD?
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: dyson.iquest.net
Message-ID: <4q2g97$j2@dyson.iquest.net>
Sender: news@iquest.net (News Admin)
Organization: John S. Dyson's home machine
References: <4pbtvj$hqq@uuneo.neosoft.com> <4q1l0j$2hm@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 02:35:19 GMT
Lines: 40

In article <4q1l0j$2hm@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com>,
 <aks@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com> wrote:
>I am afraid that BSD in general is dead. Sun dropped it as hot potato.
>Digital dropped it as rotten potato. Everyboy has moved or is moving to
>System V. Operating system , no matter how good (look at VMS), which lacks
>application software is useless, no matter how good it is.

There are NO freely redistributable versions of SVRX, just like there are
no freely redistributable versions of NT.  Speaking of rotten potato, have
you seen the SVR3-4 source code?  There is so many problems in that stuff, that
I am NOT suprised that SCO kept selling their debugged SVR3 for so long.  In
fact, I would have done the same thing.

Almost nothing is *broken* from a high level design standpoint in *BSD, but
there is political value in saying that you are selling SVRX or Solaris, etc.  I
had to support and hand-hold customers trying to use SVRX, when FreeBSD
would have easily run their applications fully loaded on machines 20-50X
cheaper.  But generally there is nothing *broken* from a high level design
standpoint in SVRX either.  Different, and sometimes inferior choices
were made in the implementation of the kernel.

It was really sad when the SVR4 applications would virtually stop running when
the systems barely started swapping.  I had to explain that their $100-500K
systems weren't big enough (but had to side-step that it was because the
OS was so pathetically inefficient.)

There was alot left in the BSD code base, it had to be put aside for
MARKETING reasons, there was almost no other rational reason for it.

So, the BSD source code has finally gotten out to the public, and it (the
public) is better off because of it.  If a small startup wants to make
a fancy routing widget -- just embed FreeBSD in it -- and you don't have
ANY licensing fees to pay.  Cool, isn't it?  If you want to put up a www
site that can perform as well as any SVRX or Solaris, you can use *BSD,
and be CONFIDENT that YOU can fix the security bugs, and not be dependent
on the whims of a vendor...  Of course, the FreeBSD team is very quick
at responding to security problems anyway.

John