Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.cis.okstate.edu!newsfeed.ksu.ksu.edu!news.physics.uiowa.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!fu-berlin.de!zrz.TU-Berlin.DE!zib-berlin.de!irz401!orion.sax.de!uriah.heep!news From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: FreeBSD ftpd 6.0 vs wu-ftpd 2.4 Date: 23 Jun 1996 13:30:25 GMT Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4qjgth$4ds@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <4q4hf3$117@ennui.ops.best.com> Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.heep.sax.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.6 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E rone@ennui.ops.best.com (Ron Echeverri) wrote: > This is a pretty inane question, but what are the advantages and > disadvantages of using the ftpd that comes with FreeBSD and using WUFTPD? wuftpd is much more feature-rich than the default one. So if you're going to setup a large anon ftp server, you will want to use wuftpd. For a simple one (non-anonymous server, or anon server with only low traffic and limited use), the default ftpd might suffice however. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)