*BSD News Article 71872


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.cis.okstate.edu!newsfeed.ksu.ksu.edu!news.mid.net!newsfeeder.gi.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.artisoft.com!usenet
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Modem at COM3: can't find it!
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 1996 23:43:37 -0700
Organization: Me
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <31CE3919.4A982BB@lambert.org>
References: <4q4bho$7ht@netnews.upenn.edu> <4q6227$qc0@panix.com>
	  <31C6C2FF.26FB@www.play-hookey.com> <4qjhhe$4ds@uriah.heep.sax.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hecate.artisoft.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (X11; I; Linux 1.1.76 i486)

J Wunsch wrote:
] Not that i really like to defend M$, but that's rather the fault of
] Little Blue's geniusses of engineers.  They've been to stingy to use a
] tri-state gate for driving the IRQ line, which would have allowed for
] shared interrupts, but yet assigned the default IRQs for com1/com3 and
] com2/com4 twice.

Actually, there is no IBM standard for com3/com4.  This was done
by a modem manufacturer who needed to plug his internal modems
into a machine with two onboard serial ports with no way to
disable the ports in hardware.

I even know which one.  Thankfully, the manufacturer is dead,
and will remain blameless (and me lawsuitless).


                                        Terry Lambert
                                        terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.