Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!sgigate.sgi.com!uhog.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!usenet From: ghudson@glacier.mit.edu (Greg Hudson) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: followup from censored port-i386@Netbsd.ORG Date: 24 Jun 1996 03:03:42 -0400 Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lines: 16 Sender: ghudson@glacier.MIT.EDU Message-ID: <x7dhgs1u1ip.fsf@glacier.MIT.EDU> References: <DERAADT.96Jun23070919@zeus.theos.com> <x7dk9wytkmo.fsf@glacier.MIT.EDU> <DERAADT.96Jun23134409@zeus.theos.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: glacier.mit.edu In-reply-to: deraadt@theos.com's message of 23 Jun 1996 19:44:09 GMT X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.1 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:3831 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:22027 As promised in my last message: [Me:] >> As for the history of the split between NetBSD and OpenBSD, not >> everyone who's read Theo's mail archive has come to the same >> conclusion that he has. [Theo:] > Did they read the version modified by someone who cracked my > machine, or the un-hacked version? I reread the coremail archive you currently have posted. It made slightly more sense to me on a second reading, but nothing seemed new or different. If someone really did break into your machine and change it, then it was after I (and other people who commented on it) read it the first time you posted it.