*BSD News Article 71885


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!sgigate.sgi.com!uhog.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!usenet
From: ghudson@glacier.mit.edu (Greg Hudson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: followup from censored port-i386@Netbsd.ORG
Date: 24 Jun 1996 03:03:42 -0400
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lines: 16
Sender: ghudson@glacier.MIT.EDU
Message-ID: <x7dhgs1u1ip.fsf@glacier.MIT.EDU>
References: <DERAADT.96Jun23070919@zeus.theos.com>
	<x7dk9wytkmo.fsf@glacier.MIT.EDU>
	<DERAADT.96Jun23134409@zeus.theos.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: glacier.mit.edu
In-reply-to: deraadt@theos.com's message of 23 Jun 1996 19:44:09 GMT
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.1
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:3831 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:22027

As promised in my last message:

[Me:]
>> As for the history of the split between NetBSD and OpenBSD, not
>> everyone who's read Theo's mail archive has come to the same
>> conclusion that he has.

[Theo:]
> Did they read the version modified by someone who cracked my
> machine, or the un-hacked version?

I reread the coremail archive you currently have posted.  It made
slightly more sense to me on a second reading, but nothing seemed new
or different.  If someone really did break into your machine and
change it, then it was after I (and other people who commented on it)
read it the first time you posted it.