*BSD News Article 72913


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.eng.convex.com!newshost.convex.com!newsgate.duke.edu!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!Belgium.EU.net!news.bel.alcatel.be!bln.sel.alcatel.de!news
From: blume_h@slbwlz.bln.sel.alcatel.de (H. Blume von Contributed)
Newsgroups: demon.ip.support,demon.tech.unix,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Batch FTP and Web Pages
Date: 05 Jul 1996 14:59:28 +0200
Organization: Alcatel SEL
Lines: 41
Sender: blume_h@slbwlz.bln.sel.alcatel.de
Message-ID: <k8afxe7t5b.fsf@slbwlz.bln.sel.alcatel.de>
References: <31D4AA3A.BC0@www.play-hookey.com>
	<31D87436.7C7F@www.play-hookey.com> <836295557snz@dsl.co.uk>
	<4rcr6v$dh@anorak.coverform.lan>
	<199607040904.LAA03824@jes.noc.nl.demon.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: slbwlz.bln.sel.alcatel.de
In-reply-to: Jim Segrave's message of Thu, 4 Jul 1996 11:04:29 +0200
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.1

>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Segrave <jes@demon.net> writes:
In article <199607040904.LAA03824@jes.noc.nl.demon.net> Jim Segrave <jes@demon.net> writes:


    >> So, what you're saying is that demon - who recently were applying for
    >> another class B address space (about 65000 users currently?) have decided
    >> in their infinite wisdom to invest in a T3?  Well, bully for them.  Let's
    >> see, 45,000,000 bits / 65,000 users = 692 *bits* each.  Woooooffff !
    >> I'll get out there and start my 86 byte/sec download now !  Ok, maybe
    >> that's a bit unfair.  They havn't got the capacity to have everyone
    >> connected at once.  Let's say they allow 6000 of us in at once, what's
    >> that, about 937 bytes per second ?  In fact, this *wonderful* T3 will
    >> allow a staggering 1607 28.8k users to get max throughput.  I'd better
    >> rush home and get in there first.

    Jim> You are aware that 

either he isn't or doesn't want to.

    Jim> 1) we don't have 65,000 dial in lines, so dividing the bandwidth by
    Jim>    the number of customers is a pointless exercise in arithmetic
    Jim> 2) if we did, it's extremely unlikely all of our users would be
    Jim>    connected at the same time - there's an unconfirmed rumour that
    Jim>    some of our customers have something called a 'real life'
    Jim> 3) that they would all need trans-Atlantic connectivity.

4) the users don't send permanently to the US all month. 

the math: if they did, they could still transfer about 
~2592000 seconds * 86 bytes = ~222912000 bytes each per month,
summing up to a total capacity of ~14580000000000 bytes (~14.5TB).
in each direction, btw.

you definitely have a *slow* link! ;-) 


rgds hb
-- 
email: src@contrib.COM / Heiko.Blume@bln.sel.alcatel.de
TCP/IP GmbH, Woertherstr. 16, 10405 Berlin
Tel: +49.30/443366-0, Fax: +49.30/443366-15