*BSD News Article 73069


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!imci5!pull-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!cambridge-news.cygnus.com!usenet-ma
From: Michael Graff <explorer@zhaneel.flame.org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: TCP latency
Date: 07 Jul 1996 13:00:16 -0400
Organization: flame.org:  yes, we do know everything
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <v6wx0gdmn3.fsf@zhaneel.flame.org>
References: <4paedl$4bm@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM>
	<31D2F0C6.167EB0E7@inuxs.att.com> <4rfkje$am5@linux.cs.Helsinki.FI>
	<31DC8EBA.41C67EA6@dyson.iquest.net> <4rlf6i$c5f@linux.cs.Helsinki.FI>
	<31DEA3A3.41C67EA6@dyson.iquest.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: zhaneel.flame.org
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.2.33/Emacs 19.31
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.networking:44273 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:3956 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:23002

"John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> writes:

> Believe it or not, I agree that it is the best (except for TTCP) for the
> application, given what is available.  It just isn't as well suited to
> the application as TTCP is.  That is one reason WHY TTCP was invented
> and added to FreeBSD.

So TTCP is something FreeBSD decided would be cool, put it in, and to hell
with standards?  Or is TTCP something standard, which I can find in an
RFC somewhere?

--Michael