Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.org.eff.talk:9715 misc.int-property:739 comp.unix.bsd:7366
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk,misc.int-property,alt.suit.att-bsdi,comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!nuchat!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva)
Subject: Interface monopolies
Re: Patents: What they are. What they aren't. Other factors.
Message-ID: <id.DYMU._TB@ferranti.com>
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
References: <1992Oct27.172831.22782@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <id.SSJU.KXL@ferranti.com> <1992Oct31.043526.11350@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1992 19:12:40 GMT
Lines: 13
In article <1992Oct31.043526.11350@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes:
> Look-and-feel suits are based on a platform of copyright infringement, not
> patent infringement. This is the type of "software patent" I'm against, since
> copyright protection can be maintained *much* longer than patent protection.
I refer to these (and the Hayes patent, for example) as interface monopolies.
I think that they are a much bigger problem than algorithm patents in the long
run, but right now I'm just watching to see what happens.
--
% Peter da Silva % 77487-5012 % +1 713 274 5180 % Har du kramat din varg idag?
/C{setlinecap}def/L{lineto}def/M{moveto}def/H{newpath 0 C 0 19 M 0 25 L 4 21 L
0 16 M 5 16 L 8 13 L 4 13 L 1 16 L 8 13 M 8 8 L stroke 2 C 10 6 M 8 8 L 10 8 L
stroke}def/T{translate}def 72 72 T 24 24 scale H 20 0 T -1 1 scale H showpage