Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!qns3.qns.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.dacom.co.kr!news.kreonet.re.kr!usenet.etri.re.kr!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!agate!reason.cdrom.com!usenet From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD - have an faq Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 05:48:05 -0700 Organization: Walnut Creek CDROM Lines: 11 Message-ID: <31ECE105.41C67EA6@FreeBSD.org> References: <4s9l9o$d9t@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <31EA6DA9.7D114A71@w3page.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: time.cdrom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b5a (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386) Blaine Minazzi wrote: > A six month old FAQ is better than No FAQ. ( imho ) I totally disagree. Absense of a FAQ causes, at worst, speculation and confusion. An outdated FAQ is tantamount to misinformation as it causes people to accept things as fact which may no longer be true. I'd prefer a user to still be asking questions rather than settle for answers which are bogus. -- - Jordan Hubbard President, FreeBSD Project