Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!news00.sunet.se!sunic!news99.sunet.se!news.funet.fi!news.cs.hut.fi!news.clinet.fi!not-for-mail From: mickey@cantina.clinet.fi (Mika Ruohotie) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: TCP latency Date: 17 Jul 1996 19:49:46 +0300 Organization: aeon net Lines: 30 Message-ID: <4sj5ja$h5j@cantina.clinet.fi> References: <4paedl$4bm@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> <4s8piu$f6p@fido.asd.sgi.com> <31E7FB69.167EB0E7@dyson.iquest.net> <4safns$3i7@holocron.odc.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: cantina.clinet.fi Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.networking:45527 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:4090 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:23823 George Henry C. Daswani <gdaswani@odc.net> wrote: >My dong is bigger than his ding-dong. Shit, get over it people. >Isn't it time for this Linux vs FreeBSD thread to finish? hehe... i cant see it ending until someone gets bothered enough and goes and runs the same several benchmarks on exactly same hardware, ofcourse coz we probably would love to see it done in a statistically right one should use _several_ equal sets of hardware, and swap combinations between the tests... i'm beginning to get bothered enough, but am good 5000 miles from home/work. and when i'm back there i'm flooded with work and would not have time... but anyway, until the above has been done probably using freebsd 2.2-current and some 2.0 version of linux, on atleast p133/166 and ppro200 machines, using rather scsi, there's not much point claiming that someone has a hardware that runs something "faster" than someone elses another set of hardware... it only proves person claiming such things is not objective enough to prove anything at all... except that person lacks the logical thinking and is an ignorant fool what comes to statistically relevant measures... mickey