Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!nntp.primenet.com!news1.best.com!nntp1.best.com!not-for-mail
From: rone@bofh.noc.best.net (Ron Echeverri)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: gcc 2.7.2p vs. gcc 2.6.3
Date: 18 Jul 1996 04:26:10 -0700
Organization: fidgety systems administrators gmbh
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <4sl70i$301@bofh.noc.best.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bofh.noc.best.net
I've installed the pgcc port and i've used it sparingly; while i know
that replacing the system binaries with new stuff is usually not a
good idea, i still wondered as to whether, since pgcc claims to be
optimized for the Pentium chip, would there be any significant
improvement if it were made the system default C compiler?
rone
--
Ron Echeverri Best Internet Systems Administration rone@best.net
==============================================================================
No, i don't know what i'm doing, and if i did, i wouldn't tell you.