Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!yale!gumby!destroyer!ais.org!lcd From: lcd@ais.org (Leon Dent) Subject: Re: 386BSD or LINUX? Message-ID: <Bx7pKF.Aw2@ais.org> Organization: UMCC References: <1992Nov4.052106.29266@menudo.uh.edu> <2582@bigfoot.first.gmd.de> <1992Nov4.160417.25258@klaava.Helsinki.FI> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1992 22:09:49 GMT Lines: 12 In article <1992Nov4.160417.25258@klaava.Helsinki.FI> torvalds@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Linus Torvalds) writes: >for the IBM PC/AT. I have reports of linux running for 50 days (under >actual load - not just sitting there) without a reboot (and even then >due to upgrading the kernel), but I also have some reports of linux not This is 50 days in a commercial operation (in a hospital I believe) with multiple Linux boxes. The main complaint is that they don't do token ring. Leon Dent lcd@ais.org