*BSD News Article 74278


Return to BSD News archive

#! rnews 3479 bsd
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!hookup!news.mathworks.com!hunter.premier.net!news1.erols.com!newsmaster@erols.com
From: Ken Bigelow <kbigelow@www.play-hookey.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.1.0-Release Install Problems. HELP!
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 11:53:26 -0700
Organization: Erols Internet Services
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <31F12B26.2C86@www.play-hookey.com>
References: <4q9t84$ih@gde.GDEsystems.COM> <31E2CC3E.4D86@bgu.edu> <31E9B700.5DDE@www.play-hookey.com> <31EC9FA2.7B61@bgu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kenjb05.play-hookey.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I)

J.Kelly wrote:
> 
> > What error messages did you get? The exact messages would be very
> > informative.
> 
> If I remember right, the messages regarding the dos partition were
> mainly about" skipping garbage"
> or something to that effect. I think the way I resolved the problem was
> to let the
> partition aspect of the setup continue with it's belief that my hd had
> 64 heads(16 really).
> After that point all seemed well(had both int and ecxt caches off) and
> the transfer from
> one partition to the other went pretty smooth.
>      I got hung up during the post install at the Xfree setup " Failed
> to locate shared file
> **3.0** (sorry about the name but I do remember looking for it and the
> message was right since
> the files in the directory it wanted were 2.0 series, comp, cp?? 2.0. (I
> downloaded all of
> the compx files in the dist)
>   Sorry about the lack of detail looking back, it's kind of a blur. Hope
> it helps.
> 
> PS: For those of you getting pissed and thinking about Linux...Go ahead
> and try it.
> When BSD drops you out of the install, you can get back in, and can get
> a little insight
> throught the debug. Redhat, well, when you are reaching for the scroll
> lock, you better
> just pass that by and turn the machine off.....
> 

I have found only one cause for the install kernel to indicate that it is 
dropping garbage from the various installation files: the cache RAM on 
the motherboard. I've gotten some "Are you sure?" questions, but I've 
never seen any alternative explanation. FreeBSD seems to access 
everything faster than DOS does, and to catch brief variations that DOS 
and Win-doze generally miss. As a test of this possibility, disable the 
External cache in the ROM BIOS setup screens and try the installation 
again. This should eliminate the "garbage ignored" messages and allow the 
FreeBSD installation to proceed.

As to the shared library, the one I've seen in such complaints is a 
missing libc.so.3.0 library from /usr/lib. The 2.1R vdersion of this is 
libc.so.2.2 in the same directory. Those packages that I've loaded that 
want the 3.0 library are happy with a symlink to the 2.2 version.

Incidentally, if you're installing X and intend to use Netscape, you 
*might* have to create another symlink so that Netscape can find an X11 
directory where FreeBSD calls it X11R6. This used to be a requirement 
when the Netscape release waqs for BSDI. However, the version 3.0b5a I 
pulled down this morning said it was for BSD/386, so maybe that's not 
needed any more -- I don't know yet.

I hope this helps!
-- 

Ken

Are you interested in   |
byte-sized education    |   http://www.play-hookey.com
over the Internet?      |