Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!news.sgi.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.inc.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!awfulhak.demon.co.uk!awfulhak.demon.co.uk!awfulhak.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk (Brian Somers) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware Subject: Re: Does cache memory size 512K over 256K matter? Followup-To: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware Date: 23 Jul 1996 16:00:20 +0100 Organization: Coverform Ltd. Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4t2pe4$9o@anorak.coverform.lan> References: <Pine.A32.3.93.960716180913.29739A-100000@r2d3.sbac.edu> <31F17B64.EDF@www.play-hookey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.coverform.lan X-NNTP-Posting-Host: awfulhak.demon.co.uk X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:24292 comp.os.linux.hardware:45406 Ken Bigelow (kbigelow@www.play-hookey.com) wrote: [relevent stuff deleted] : I doubt if size will make too much difference, but speed very definitely : will. [The rest of the relevent stuff delted] I wouldn't let your partner hear that ! ;-) -- Brian <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....