Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!rpi!scott.skidmore.edu!psinntp!psinntp!pool!ujlh From: ujlh@pool.info.sunyit.edu (James Henrickson) Subject: Re: 386BSD or LINUX? Message-ID: <1992Nov5.221949.9340@pool.info.sunyit.edu> Organization: State University of New York -- Institute of Technology References: <Nov.2.20.33.38.1992.18690@remus.rutgers.edu> <1992Nov4.201721.1036@gulasch.hanse.de> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 22:19:49 GMT Lines: 20 In article <1992Nov4.201721.1036@gulasch.hanse.de> elmar@gulasch.hanse.de (Elmar Folba) writes: >In article <Nov.2.20.33.38.1992.18690@remus.rutgers.edu> glenw@remus.rutgers.edu (Glenn Wasserman) writes: >>As the subject heading says, which is it? Which is the better,more >>supported operating system (I know I'm going to get a lot on this >>one!) >>... >Not necessarily. Who, do you think, has significant and comparable experience >with both systems? >And: what is 'better'? Better suited to which purpose? > I've used both systems. I switched to 386BSD because it had better networking facilities and supported my NE2000 clone. When Linux networking improves, I'll probably put it back on one of my systems. -- Jim H. * * James L. Henrickson | "I don't need a signature, I need a job!" * ujlh@sunyit.edu | BSCS, December 1992