Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!oleane!jussieu.fr!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news.mathworks.com!news2.cais.net!news.cais.net!nntp.uio.no!nntp-oslo.UNINETT.no!nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!not-for-mail From: sthaug@nethelp.no (Steinar Haug) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Is this a sign of bad memory? Date: 29 Jul 1996 18:19:47 GMT Organization: Nethelp Consulting, Trondheim, Norway Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4tivc3$9tt@verdi.nethelp.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: trane.uninett.no After upgrading my P133 from 32 MByte to 64 MByte, I've started getting error messages like these: Jul 25 18:47:35 verdi /kernel: pid 470 (netscape.bin), uid 1001: exited on signal 10 Jul 25 23:05:00 verdi /kernel: pid 529 (suck), uid 8: exited on signal 10 Jul 27 01:09:28 verdi /kernel: pid 434 (in.nnrpd), uid 8: exited on signal 10 Since signal 10 is SIGBUS, I tend to suspect that one of my new SIMMs is bad. Are there other good suggestions? Any way to check this except start swapping SIMMs? Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no