Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.mira.net.au!vic.news.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!psgrain!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!csn!nntp-xfer-1.csn.net!csn!nntp-xfer-2.csn.net!symbios.com!southwind.net!usenet From: ravenpub@southwind.net (Carl D. Cravens) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Am5x86 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 21:42:27 -0500 Organization: Phoenyx PBeM Roleplaying Lines: 12 Message-ID: <T0TEywIeEDtV090yn@southwind.net> References: <fred-0808961614150001@st-ursen.lightside.net> <4uf8mo$ium@main.gbdata.com> <320D2C6D.7765@www.play-hookey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: onyx.southwind.net X-Newsreader: Yarn 0.90 with YES 0.22 On Sat, 10 Aug 1996 17:42:21 -0700, Ken Bigelow <kbigelow@www.play-hookey.com> wrote: >Just to confirm compatibility: My secondary server (which among other >things runs my daughter's MUX) is running an AMD 5x86-133 at full speed >with no trouble. Currently it runs 2.1R; I haven't upgraded yet. However, >with decent RAM and a fast enough cache, it runs fine. Here's another confirmation of the ADM 5x86-133... no problems running 2.1.5R. (Can't beat that chip on bang for the buck, eh?) -- Carl (ravenpub@southwind.net) I've got a chainsaw... what could go wrong?