*BSD News Article 7623


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!giac1.oscs.montana.edu!osycs
From: osycs@giac1.oscs.montana.edu (Craig Spannring)
Subject: Re: Largest file size for 386BSD ?
Message-ID: <1992Nov9.090041.25116@coe.montana.edu>
Keywords: n
Sender: usenet@coe.montana.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Geographic Information & Analysis Center Montana State University
References: <1992Nov6.031757.20766@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg> <1992Nov6.173454.17896@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 09:00:41 GMT
Lines: 24

In article <1992Nov6.173454.17896@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes:
>In article <1992Nov6.031757.20766@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg> eoahmad@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Othman Ahmad) writes:
>>This will be an important issue because soon we'll have hundreds of gigabytes,
>>instead of magabytes soon.
>>	It took the jump from tens mega to hundreds in just 10 years.
>
>Get around the problem:
>
[ 4 suggestions deleted. ]
>
>I don't think it will be an issue that soon anyway.

Not too long ago I used to think that way also.  Then my boss came up 
to me because he couldn't edit a text file in vi.  I scratched
my head for a moment then did an ls -alg just for the heck of it.
The stupid text file was 93 MEGABYTES!  Arg.  I think the limitation
will hit big in less than ten years.  Hopefully by then all the machines
will have 64 bit words and the maximum file size will grow accordingly.

-- 
=========================================================================
 Six of one, 110 (base 2) of | Craig Spannring --- (406) 994-6128
 another.                    | osycs.giac1.oscs.montana.edu
 ----------------------------+ Geographic Information & Analysis Center