Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.solaris:498 comp.unix.bsd:7829 Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!haven.umd.edu!uunet!pipex!warwick!fulcrum!igb From: igb@fulcrum.co.uk (Ian G Batten) Subject: Re: Solaris 1.1 vs. Solaris 2.0 (BSD vs AT&T) Message-ID: <Bxt8rG.DE3@fulcrum.co.uk> Sender: news@fulcrum.co.uk Organization: Fulcrum Communications References: <1992Nov13.232053.7061@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu> <1992Nov15.014513.28154@nobeltech.se> <1992Nov15.035135.15514@ra.msstate.edu> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 13:14:04 GMT Lines: 8 In article <1992Nov15.035135.15514@ra.msstate.edu> fwp@CC.MsState.Edu (Frank Peters) writes: > Most other major workstation vendors already use SYSV. MAny of the Really? DEC don't. IBM don't. HP don't really. Who's left who qualify as ``major''? I don't know if SGI are (a) major or (b) Sys V, but it doesn't really matter. ian