Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.solaris:525 comp.unix.bsd:7921 Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!fulcrum!igb From: igb@fulcrum.co.uk (Ian G Batten) Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: Solaris 1.1 vs. Solaris 2.0 (BSD vs AT&T) Message-ID: <BxwMtv.AxG@fulcrum.co.uk> Date: 18 Nov 92 09:10:43 GMT References: <BxuEtw.HnL@world.std.com> <1992Nov17.123856.29315@udel.edu> <RMF.92Nov17173206@chopin.cs.columbia.edu> Sender: news@fulcrum.co.uk Organization: Fulcrum Communications Lines: 8 In article <RMF.92Nov17173206@chopin.cs.columbia.edu> rmf@chopin.cs.columbia.edu (Robert M. Fuhrer) writes: > In short, AIX is quite unlike BSD and Sys V under the covers. If you want the > covers on, it still may be less like them than you want. On the other hand, > some of the differences are appealing... My original comment stands. I have worked on RS/6000en. ian