*BSD News Article 7870


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.unix.solaris:525 comp.unix.bsd:7921
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!fulcrum!igb
From: igb@fulcrum.co.uk (Ian G Batten)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: Solaris 1.1 vs. Solaris 2.0 (BSD vs AT&T)
Message-ID: <BxwMtv.AxG@fulcrum.co.uk>
Date: 18 Nov 92 09:10:43 GMT
References: <BxuEtw.HnL@world.std.com> <1992Nov17.123856.29315@udel.edu> <RMF.92Nov17173206@chopin.cs.columbia.edu>
Sender: news@fulcrum.co.uk
Organization: Fulcrum Communications
Lines: 8

In article <RMF.92Nov17173206@chopin.cs.columbia.edu> rmf@chopin.cs.columbia.edu (Robert M. Fuhrer) writes:
> In short, AIX is quite unlike BSD and Sys V under the covers. If you want the
> covers on, it still may be less like them than you want. On the other hand,
> some of the differences are appealing...

My original comment stands.  I have worked on RS/6000en.

ian