*BSD News Article 79737


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.mathworks.com!howland.erols.net!EU.net!main.Germany.EU.net!Dortmund.Germany.EU.net!interface-business.de!usenet
From: j@ida.interface-business.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc
Subject: Re: Why one should buy parity memory for reliability?
Date: 2 Oct 1996 11:57:12 GMT
Organization: interface business GmbH, Dresden
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <52tlao$9uf@innocence.interface-business.de>
References: <32485B0D.41C6@austin.ibm.com> <52br3d$9s8@flash.noc.best.net>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@interface-business.de (Joerg Wunsch)
NNTP-Posting-Host: ida.interface-business.de
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.6
X-Phone: +49-351-31809-14
X-Fax: +49-351-3361187
X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F  93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:28422 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:5046

dillon@best.com (Matthew Dillon) wrote:

>     Parity memory is important for several reasons:

While i agree with this...

>     (1) memory densities are increasing and the smaller geometries are
> 	susceptable to radiation.  When you throw 512 MBytes onto a
> 	machine, you need to *know* that it works.

...the ``radiation'' problem is something that has long since gone.
At least, the original one.  It was caused by alpha particles, since
these are rather heavy-weighted (helium nuclei), thus they were able
to discharge the memory capacitor at once all the time since the era
of 64 kbit RAMs.  However, due to their big size, these nuclei cannot
penetrate even moderate amounts of harder material, even a few 10 µm's
of plastics are a complete shield against them.  Thus, any of our
today's plastics IC cases is sufficient to shield even against a huge
amount of them.  The worst case were the old (and expensive) ceramics
packages, they contained traces of beryllium which is a lightly
nuclear-active material, and thus was generating the dangerous
radiation itself.  (The usual measure against this was to plastics-
encapsulate the chip inside the case, or to put a PE foil above it
before closing the case.)

-- 
J"org Wunsch					       Unix support engineer
joerg_wunsch@interface-business.de       http://www.interface-business.de/~j