Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!asstdc.scgt.oz.au!nsw.news.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!vic.news.telstra.net!news.mira.net.au!pumpkin.pangea.ca!eru.mt.luth.se!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!EU.net!usenet2.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!hole.news.pipex.net!pipex!news.hol.gr!news From: sergios@prometheus.hol.gr (Sergios) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: async Date: Thu, 03 Oct 1996 00:00:28 GMT Organization: . Lines: 5 Message-ID: <3252f11b.1314289@news.hol.gr> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp70.ppp.hol.gr Summary: . X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99e/32.227 I added an "async" option for the /usr and /usr/local filesystems in /etc/fstab. the mount man page clearly states this as a BAD thing....but! is it? is Ufs as rock solid as a ext2 flesystem? Do I risk corrupting my filesystem?