Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.mathworks.com!news-peer.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news-stkh.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!nntp-oslo.UNINETT.no!nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!not-for-mail From: sthaug@nethelp.no (Steinar Haug) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: What good are extra vnodes? Date: 05 Oct 1996 18:18:51 GMT Organization: Nethelp Consulting, Trondheim, Norway Lines: 10 Message-ID: <5368qb$7tu@verdi.nethelp.no> References: <52evvt$s6b@nntp1.best.com> <52tknn$3hg@news.demos.su> <5364g1$ba@uriah.heep.sax.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: aun.uninett.no In-reply-to: j@uriah.heep.sax.de's message of 5 Oct 1996 17:05:05 GMT [J Wunsch] | Btw., the mmap() in -current is said to be no longer broken. However, | it now triggers a brokeness in the usage of mmap() in INN. (IIRC, INN | tries to change the size of the active file while it's being mmap'ed.) Do you have any more info about this? It would be very interesting to get INN to work with mmap(). Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no