*BSD News Article 79992


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!news.artisoft.com!usenet
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: What is a zombie?
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 1996 16:57:40 -0700
Organization: Me
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <3256F5F4.7217ACEC@lambert.org>
References: <52a5dt$qef@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <3249D8F7.2EA39DDA@lambert.org>
	  <52jtk1$8s@uriah.heep.sax.de> <324F080E.4BFCA0F@lambert.org>
	  <52nr0k$baa@uriah.heep.sax.de> <32501DAC.2BEEACF9@lambert.org> <5361v2$ba@uriah.heep.sax.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hecate.artisoft.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (X11; I; Linux 1.1.76 i486)

J Wunsch wrote:
] > Besides, the fix is so trivial it is beneath my level of interest
] > to pound it through the constipated send-pr pipe.
] 
] Of course, i have to accept your argument that you are not interested
] in this -- but then, stop bitching about it being trivial and below
] Your Great Level of Inspiration.

I said "interest", not "inspiration".

And the primary reason it is below my level of interest is that
I am a software engineer, not a salesman, and I choose to spend
my free time engineering software, not selling my ideas to
historically unwilling buyers.

If there were some assurances (like no outstanding PR's over a
certain age) that the code would even be looked at, I *might*
be willing to tackle an implementation of SA_NOCLDWAIT.

Of course the problem is trivially solvable by making the
distinction between SIG_IGN and SIG_DFL instead, without
dragging in all of the overdesigned mass which happens to
include SA_NOCLDWAIT.

Cost/benefit analysis:

Positives

	o	working implementation with SA_NOCLDWAIT

Negatives

	o	SA_NOCLDWAIT is an implementation detail, since
		a woking soloution does not require it
	o	My code reaps its children, so I never have the
		problem in the first place
	o	I have to fight a battle to get the code integrated
		because of the integration bottleneck
	o	Use of send-pr relocates, but does not eliminate,
		the bottleneck

Conclusions

	o	It is below my level of interest to pursue a
		soloution to this problem


Nothing personal.  Feel free to provide evidence to change my
perception of the situation.


					Regards,
                                        Terry Lambert
                                        terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.