Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news2.acs.oakland.edu!condor.ic.net!news.cic.net!butthead!feeder.chicago.cic.net!chi-news.cic.net!newspump.sol.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!nntp.crl.com!Symiserver2.symantec.com!news From: tedm@agora.rdrop.com Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: What good are extra vnodes? Date: 6 Oct 1996 15:55:26 GMT Organization: Symantec Corp. Lines: 12 Message-ID: <538kpe$b9d@Symiserver2.symantec.com> References: <52evvt$s6b@nntp1.best.com> <52tknn$3hg@news.demos.su> <5364g1$ba@uriah.heep.sax.de> Reply-To: tedm@agora.rdrop.com NNTP-Posting-Host: shiva1.central.com X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2.5 In <5364g1$ba@uriah.heep.sax.de>, j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) writes: > >Btw., the mmap() in -current is said to be no longer broken. However, >it now triggers a brokeness in the usage of mmap() in INN. (IIRC, INN >tries to change the size of the active file while it's being mmap'ed.) > Ah, but for those of us who aren't kernel hackers, the $64 question is: Will mmap() ir INN be fixed enough in the next release of both FreeBSD and INN so that INN will be able to use it?